(Sorry the orginal is cut off. Since it was pulled on TC I can't go back and get the photo or the text that ran over.)
Subject: "For those that need further proof that I'm not a fake" Previous topic | Next topic
FairyQuadmother
Fri May-18-07 07:39 AM
Member since May 14th 2007
29 posts
#278617, "For those that need further proof that I'm not a fake"
Thu May-17-07 11:47 PM by FairyQuadmother
Here's birth certificates. I blacked out info because I am NOT comfortable sharing certain information with people I don't know.
If you aren't convinced... I'm just at a loss for words.
Spontaneous GGBB at 32.1 weeks
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
Replies to this topic
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., casanndra, May 17th 2007, #1
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., Teamtriple, May 18th 2007, #24
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., tripletots98, May 17th 2007, #2
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., azwallace, May 17th 2007, #5
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., casanndra, May 17th 2007, #3
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., azwallace, May 17th 2007, #4
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., catybarra, May 17th 2007, #6
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., G5_R_Us, May 17th 2007, #7
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., azwallace, May 18th 2007, #11
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., G5_R_Us, May 18th 2007, #13
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., azwallace, May 18th 2007, #14
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., tripletots98, May 18th 2007, #16
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., Sister Ray, May 18th 2007, #26
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., emano70, May 17th 2007, #8
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., casanndra, May 17th 2007, #9
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., azwallace, May 17th 2007, #10
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., azwallace, May 18th 2007, #12
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., tripletots98, May 18th 2007, #15
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., Prairie3, May 18th 2007, #17
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., azwallace, May 18th 2007, #18
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., Prairie3, May 18th 2007, #19
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., casanndra, May 18th 2007, #21
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., casanndra, May 18th 2007, #20
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., peksc, May 18th 2007, #22
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., angeliagg, May 18th 2007, #23
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., Sister Ray, May 18th 2007, #25
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., tripplefun, May 18th 2007, #27
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., Triplethefun04, May 18th 2007, #28
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., JulieETM, May 18th 2007, #29
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., foreveramom, May 18th 2007, #30
RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..., foreveramom, May 18th 2007, #31
casanndra
Thu May-17-07 11:44 PM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
140 posts
#278619, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 0
You forgot to cut off the part about it being filed in 1959 on the 3rd certificate otherwise great job!
Kelli
Mommy to Morgan (9) and spontaneous B/B/G triplets Eric, Josh, and Hannah born 2/28/04 @ 33w1d
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
Teamtriple
Fri May-18-07 12:51 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
44 posts
#278645, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 1
I am so glad that I called her a faker!! I really hate people that do this. Someone needs to contact her parents. Can we even do that??
Tracy
Proud Mom to Triplets Plus Two....
Shelby, Jerry, Taylor
Jeremy and Sierra
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
tripletots98
Thu May-17-07 11:45 PM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
1273 posts
#278620, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 0
Thu May-17-07 11:52 PM by tripletots98
>
>
Why is this dated March 9, 1959?
I found these to be interesting links...
http://sbw9888.deviantart.com/
http://www.insimenator.net/showthread.php?t=13899&page=4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxAGhfpjkKs
sbw9888 (5 months ago) marked as spam
I watch this video, and see Loren slowly lowering Max onto the floor for his tantrum, or sobbing toddlers waddling away. And for a second, just a split second, I wonder why anyone would want to be a mother.
But then I think of the other movies and stories you've posted. I see happy toddlers kidding, hugging, and comforting each other. Just experimenting with this world they're in.
And then, I know why so many babies are born.
There are bad moments, but the good ones outweigh them so much.
Amy~
Paige, Austin & Hailee - 8yrs
10/29/98 34w1d
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
azwallace
Thu May-17-07 11:53 PM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
711 posts
#278624, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 2
Hee, hee, hee, hee, hee!
Stephanie
Mama to Beautiful Quads
Born October 12, 2005
30 weeks, 5 days
and ^Angel Baby^ 1/05
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
casanndra
Thu May-17-07 11:49 PM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
140 posts
#278622, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 0
Look at that you edited it to hide the 1959. Too late, someone reposted it.
Kelli
Mommy to Morgan (9) and spontaneous B/B/G triplets Eric, Josh, and Hannah born 2/28/04 @ 33w1d
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
azwallace
Thu May-17-07 11:51 PM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
711 posts
#278623, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 0
Thu May-17-07 11:56 PM by azwallace
I don't usually respond to these but I don't believe you. It is amazing how they are IDENTICAL except for the children's names. Even the funny B for the beginning of your name. If each were typed, how are they so identical? Plus if you look at the box for the sex, the girls' say Female with a capital and the boys' say male with a lower case. Plus, the placing of those words are such that it looks like you simply doctored the "Fe" off to make it male. Not buying it.
Plus, I read a thread saying that your name refers to your body building days, hence the "quad", not because you had quadruplets.
Here is the link if you have forgotten!
http://www.scrapjazz.com/community/jazzclub/showthread.php?t=55173
You say it all in there!
Stephanie
Mama to Beautiful Quads
Born October 12, 2005
30 weeks, 5 days
and ^Angel Baby^ 1/05
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
catybarra
Thu May-17-07 11:54 PM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
593 posts
#278625, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 0
Let's say it all together, in unison, everyone:
BUSTED!!!!!
Cathy
Come visit us at http://www.leighaandthetriplets.blogspot.com/
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
G5_R_Us
Thu May-17-07 11:54 PM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
422 posts
#278626, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 0
So were they born in Dec of 2003 as shown or are they 4 yrs 5 mos?? Can't be both. Do the math.
Listen, Sarah, this board has had it's share of fakers. You are not the first, and you won't be the last. In case you have not noticed, a family who are members here just lost a child. Could you please show some respect and just stop this!? All of you. Really. Grow up!
Kara~
BGG 4yrs 11-23-02
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
azwallace
Fri May-18-07 12:00 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
711 posts
#278630, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 7
I really mean this, who is Sarah? I thought her name was Beth??? How do you know her name is Sarah?
Stephanie
Mama to Beautiful Quads
Born October 12, 2005
30 weeks, 5 days
and ^Angel Baby^ 1/05
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
G5_R_Us
Fri May-18-07 12:06 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
422 posts
#278632, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 11
Click on the SBW link above. She knows who she is.
Kara~
BGG 4yrs 11-23-02
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
azwallace
Fri May-18-07 12:10 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
711 posts
#278633, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 13
Sh*%. She's 14??? Someone needs to be grounded!
Stephanie
Mama to Beautiful Quads
Born October 12, 2005
30 weeks, 5 days
and ^Angel Baby^ 1/05
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
tripletots98
Fri May-18-07 12:14 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
1273 posts
#278637, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 14
>Sh*%. She's 14??? Someone needs to be grounded!
OOOHHH...I'm tellin'! Her parents are gonna take her computer away!
Amy~
Paige, Austin & Hailee - 8yrs
10/29/98 34w1d
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
Sister Ray
Fri May-18-07 01:13 AM
Member since Feb 20th 2006
4 posts
#278647, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 7
>So were they born in Dec of 2003 as shown or are they 4 yrs 5
>mos?? Can't be both. Do the math.
>
>Listen, Sarah, this board has had it's share of fakers. You
>are not the first, and you won't be the last. In case you have
>not noticed, a family who are members here just lost a child.
>Could you please show some respect and just stop this!? All of
>you. Really. Grow up!
>
>Kara~
>BGG 4yrs 11-23-02
>
I was thinking the same thing. For someone to fake after something like Hayden's death is beyond the pale. Fakers are annoying at the best of times, but this is as bad as it gets.
To the faker - I'm not a triplet, or a mother of them, and I can still come here because I don't pretend to be any of those things. (I am an id twin, but I can produce the actual twin in question. )
Join the multiple birth fakers group - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/multiplebirthfakers/
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
emano70
Thu May-17-07 11:54 PM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
195 posts
#278627, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 0
LOOOOOOOL.. good job Kelli!
http://www.myspace.com/princessplus3
Eman (36)
DH (35)
DD Leya ....... Jan 10, 2002
GBG @ 32 weeks 5 days...
Maya, Khalid & Talya ..
June 1, 2004 (each weighing 3.5 Lbs.)
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
casanndra
Thu May-17-07 11:56 PM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
140 posts
#278628, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 8
Can't take all the credit, tripletots posted at the same time, and she was smart enough to repost the pic before she edited it.
Kelli
Mommy to Morgan (9) and spontaneous B/B/G triplets Eric, Josh, and Hannah born 2/28/04 @ 33w1d
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
azwallace
Thu May-17-07 11:57 PM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
711 posts
#278629, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 9
Look at the link I posted in my edited response! It has a thread of hers!
Stephanie
Mama to Beautiful Quads
Born October 12, 2005
30 weeks, 5 days
and ^Angel Baby^ 1/05
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
azwallace
Fri May-18-07 12:02 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
711 posts
#278631, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 9
Holy crap! She did repost it without the date. What a clever gal! Too bad she didn't catch it BEFORE posting it!
Stephanie
Mama to Beautiful Quads
Born October 12, 2005
30 weeks, 5 days
and ^Angel Baby^ 1/05
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
tripletots98
Fri May-18-07 12:13 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
1273 posts
#278636, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 12
Right click on the red x, then click on show picture! Otherwise, I have the 1959 Birth Cert saved in my word documents and am happy to share!
Yes, this FAKER is pointless & a waste of good computer time but good lord! People were actually falling for her line of BULLS***!
Amy~
Paige, Austin & Hailee - 8yrs
10/29/98 34w1d
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
Prairie3
Fri May-18-07 12:18 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
789 posts
#278638, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 0
I saw the '59 before she blacked it out too. Good work ladies!!! Shouldn't a 14 yr old be doing some REAL homework! LOL!
Julie
BGB ~ June 16, 2005 @ 31wks 3 days
Samuel Jonas (3lbs 11oz)
Leona Ruth (3lbs 5oz)
Gabriel Douglas (2lbs 11oz)
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
azwallace
Fri May-18-07 12:22 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
711 posts
#278639, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 17
Fri May-18-07 12:23 AM by azwallace
She just sent me this private message:
You have following message from FairyQuadmother.
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Ok ok
Message: So I admit I'm a faker sorry.
But... the last thread you posted? I've never seen it before in my
life. When TiffaniRay thought I sbw9888, she said I had scrapbooking
threads... I googled it and came up with nothing. I was really confused. Now
I'm not. But yeah, there are people with the same screen names. The
internet is BIG. And that isn't mine.
This email is sent to you because you requested an email notification
whenever you have a new message in your inbox.
Thank you,
The Triplet Connection
Forum administrator
Stephanie
Mama to Beautiful Quads
Born October 12, 2005
30 weeks, 5 days
and ^Angel Baby^ 1/05
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
Prairie3
Fri May-18-07 12:24 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
789 posts
#278640, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 18
LOL...you got her Stephanie Good job!
Julie
BGB ~ June 16, 2005 @ 31wks 3 days
Samuel Jonas (3lbs 11oz)
Leona Ruth (3lbs 5oz)
Gabriel Douglas (2lbs 11oz)
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
casanndra
Fri May-18-07 12:32 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
140 posts
#278642, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 18
Finally.
Kelli
Mommy to Morgan (9) and spontaneous B/B/G triplets Eric, Josh, and Hannah born 2/28/04 @ 33w1d
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
casanndra
Fri May-18-07 12:27 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
140 posts
#278641, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 0
Here is the original for those that can't see it...
http://imageshack.us>
Kelli
Mommy to Morgan (9) and spontaneous B/B/G triplets Eric, Josh, and Hannah born 2/28/04 @ 33w1d
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
peksc
Fri May-18-07 12:44 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
421 posts
#278643, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 0
Fri May-18-07 12:45 AM by peksc
If their birthday was Dec 7, 2003 they can not be 4.5 years old...they would only be 3.5 years old...
HMmm....
Liz
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
angeliagg
Fri May-18-07 12:49 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
674 posts
#278644, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 0
Awesome job on calling this out. After the whole Mandie fiasco, fakers need to be called out so that real TC members aren't hurt by their dishonesty. I'm relieved that Tiffany and others aren't letting fakers like this chick get one over on us.
GBB born Dec 27, 2005 at 31w4d
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
Sister Ray
Fri May-18-07 01:10 AM
Member since Feb 20th 2006
4 posts
#278646, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 0
I'm not sure why she expected to be believed, since as soon as she made her first post I googled her to see if her quads came up. We are not so blase towards HOMs now that spontaneous quads don't get any attention.
this makes me ashamed to be young.
Join the multiple birth fakers group - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/multiplebirthfakers/
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
tripplefun
Fri May-18-07 05:04 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
882 posts
#278651, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 0
Fri May-18-07 05:23 AM by tripplefun
Sarah, Beth, whatever your name is. Can you answer us all one question? What is the point of trying to pass yourself off as having quads? Seriously, as a parent of triplets I would really love your honest opinion as to whats in that pea-brain head of yours.
We have seen this way too much here on TC. I truly do not understand the point, what a waste of time this is, I see you went thru alot of trouble trying to prove all of this BS, it got you absolutely no where.
I never usually reply to the faker crap, I just really would like to know why? WHY?? And im sure many of us here would also like to know what the point in you doing this is? I read the link a day or 2 ago that showed you were 14. Regardless of your age, you need to check yourself and really think about what you do and the affect it has on others. Especially all the heartbreak going on here right now with a members child passing away. You responded to those posts and that my dear makes you flat out sick.
Please in all honesty share with us what the point of all of this is?
Edited to change my wording, quads instead of triplets.
Sandy
mom to 4 kids
oldest is 18, and trio age 7
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
Triplethefun04
Fri May-18-07 06:51 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
135 posts
#278656, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 0
Good work ladies! I go to bed and miss all the fun!
Now for the negative nellies can we get a Thank You for the hard work put in to prove this CHILD to be a fake quad mom??? Really, some people think we just sit around looking for people to pick on...really...
AGAIN - YOU LADIES ROCK!!!
Michelle
(formerly known as bsebllmom9 )
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
JulieETM
Fri May-18-07 07:28 AM
Member since Jul 18th 2005
1227 posts
#278660, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 0
Fri May-18-07 07:35 AM by JulieETM
You are so bold.
Why did you Email me personally to get support after I posted initally? Well... here's is my response.
I am very disapointed. My first response is to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. Why are you doing this?
As I posted before: I hope you find the support and help you need.
Please stop wasting our time.
Julie
Mom to g,b,b (ETM)
and SUPRISE baby girl (K)
"Even the worst day with my children is better than a good day at work."
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
foreveramom
Fri May-18-07 07:34 AM
Member since Jan 30th 2006
807 posts
#278663, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 0
Thank you for posting those BCs fairyquadmom. I always knew you had to be real - really psychotic.
Please, before you post again on another website that you want 4 girls and 3 boys (7 kids all together) which is what I have - exactly...
Please, before you go to my youtube and comment again....
Please, before you come on here again and claim to have 2 ID girls, one of whom is named Ruca... just tell yourself the voices you hear in your head are NOT real.
I think you've got some issues - perhaps some intervention from law enforcement could be warranted.
Just go away. Nobody's buying your story.
Bad timing, bad joke, bad person.
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
foreveramom
Fri May-18-07 07:58 AM
Member since Jan 30th 2006
807 posts
#278665, "RE: For those that need further proof that I'm not a fa..."
In response to Reply # 30
This woman tried to pull one over on many. Just helps you understand that those on the internet aren't necessarily what they appear to be.
Subject: What's the problem here?
Message: Lesa, I am not obsessed with you. I am not a faker.
I really don't know what else to tell anyone.
I'm going to leave this website, because it doesn't offer the support I was
looking for, but first I wanted to ask you something.
Why would you believe I'm infatuated with you? Because someone, based on one
thing I said, said I was? What if had been reversed? What if, instead, someone
had said that YOU'RE obsessed with me, because your daughter is 2 years younger
than mine, and named Ruca? There is no reason for someone to even say that I am.
I also don't see why someone would say that I'm a faker.
And one more thing. The moderators on this board are way out of line. It is one
thing to say I'm a faker, if they're just being protective, and sticking to
that, even after it's ridiculous to do so, is stupid. But they really pass a
line by telling me my child dying is "convenient". Even if she did think I was a
faker, she has no reason to suspect I didn't just lose my baby. And to say that
didn't happen, is horrible.
Goodbye.
Pass this on if you want to.
Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment